Optical Real-Time Cardiorenal Toxin Uric Acid Measurement During Hemodialysis Using a Miniaturized Optical Sensor.

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at higher cardiovascular risk than the general population. Cardiovascular diseases, vascular calcification among them, are the leading cause of death in these patients. Factors influencing vascular calcification are oxidative stress, inflammation, and accumulation of uremic toxins during CKD. Uric acid is a cardiorenal toxin that accumulates in the case of kidney malfunction. The primary therapy for replacing kidney function and removing toxins from end-stage renal disease patients is hemodialysis. Effective removal of toxins can be estimated by blood or dialysate lab analysis or optical monitoring. In this study, the authors tested a miniaturized optical sensor for monitoring uric acid levels and removal for the first time in a more extensive clinical study, including Hemodialysis (HD) and Post-dilutional online hemodiafiltration (HDF) procedures with different settings in Tallinn, Estonia. The results (Mean±SD, Lab vs. Sensor) of the uric acid concentration 57.20±34.05 vs. 57.22±33.09 µmol/L, reduction ratio 68.72±10.91 vs. 67.89±12.48 %, and total removed amount 7.00±2.10 vs. 7.33±2.29 mmol did not differ significantly from the values obtained from the clinical laboratory (p<0.05).Clinical Relevance-During this study, a miniaturized optical sensor was tested for the first time in the clinic in different dialysis settings. The results confirm that the sensor is reliable for regularly monitoring cardiorenal toxin uric acid removal during hemodialysis.

Time-averaged concentration estimation of uraemic toxins with different removal kinetics: a novel approach based on intradialytic spent dialysate measurements.

Background: Kt/Vurea is the most used marker to estimate dialysis adequacy; however, it does not reflect the removal of many other uraemic toxins, and a new approach is needed. We have assessed the feasibility of estimating intradialytic serum time-averaged concentration (TAC) of various uraemic toxins from their spent dialysate concentrations that can be estimated non-invasively online with optical methods. Methods: Serum and spent dialysate levels and total removed solute (TRS) of urea, uric acid (UA), indoxyl sulphate (IS) and ß2-microglobulin (ß2M) were evaluated with laboratory methods during 312 haemodialysis sessions in 78 patients with four different dialysis treatment settings. TAC was calculated from serum concentrations and evaluated from TRS and logarithmic mean concentrations of spent dialysate (MlnD). Results: Mean (± standard deviation) intradialytic serum TAC values of urea, UA, ß2M and IS were 10.4 ± 3.8 mmol/L, 191.6 ± 48.1 µmol/L, 13.3 ± 4.3 mg/L and 82.9 ± 43.3 µmol/L, respectively. These serum TAC values were similar and highly correlated with those estimated from TRS [10.5 ± 3.6 mmol/L (R 2 = 0.92), 191.5 ± 42.8 µmol/L (R 2 = 0.79), 13.0 ± 3.2 mg/L (R 2 = 0.59) and 82.7 ± 40.0 µmol/L (R 2 = 0.85)] and from MlnD [10.7 ± 3.7 mmol/L (R 2 = 0.92), 191.6 ± 43.8 µmol/L (R 2 = 0.80), 12.9 ± 3.2 mg/L (R 2 = 0.63) and 82.2 ± 38.6 µmol/L (R 2 = 0.84)], respectively. Conclusions: Intradialytic serum TAC of different uraemic toxins can be estimated non-invasively from their concentration in spent dialysate. This sets the stage for TAC estimation from online optical monitoring of spent dialysate concentrations of diverse solutes and for further optimization of estimation models for each uraemic toxin.

Treatment with Paracetamol Can Interfere with the Intradialytic Optical Estimation in Spent Dialysate of Uric Acid but Not of Indoxyl Sulfate.

Optical online methods are used to monitor the haemodialysis treatment efficiency of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the administration of UV-absorbing drugs, such as paracetamol (Par), on the accuracy of optical monitoring the removal of uremic toxins uric acid (UA) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) during standard haemodialysis (HD) and haemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments. Nine patients received Par in daily dosages 1−4 g for 30 sessions. For 137 sessions, in 36 patients the total daily dosage of UV-absorbing drugs was less than 500 mg, and for 6 sessions 3 patients received additional UV-absorbing drugs. Par administration slightly affected the accuracy of optically assessed removal of UA expressed as bias between optically and laboratory-assessed reduction ratios (RR) during HD but not HDF employing UV absorbance of spent dialysate (p < 0.05) at 295 nm wavelength with the strongest correlation between the concentration of UA and absorbance. Corresponding removal of IS based on fluorescence at Ex280/Em400 nm during HD and HDF was not affected. Administration of UV-absorbing drugs may in some settings influence the accuracy of optical assessments in spent dialysate of the removal of uremic solutes during haemodialysis treatment of ESKD patients.

Optical Method and Biochemical Source for the Assessment of the Middle-Molecule Uremic Toxin ß2-Microglobulin in Spent Dialysate.

Optical monitoring of spent dialysate has been used to estimate the removal of water-soluble low molecular weight as well as protein-bound uremic toxins from the blood of end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. The aim of this work was to develop an optical method to estimate the removal of ß2-microglobulin (ß2M), a marker of middle molecule (MM) uremic toxins, during hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Ultraviolet (UV) and fluorescence spectra of dialysate samples were recorded from 88 dialysis sessions of 22 ESKD patients, receiving four different settings of dialysis treatments. Stepwise regression was used to obtain the best model for the assessment of ß2M concentration in the spent dialysate. The correlation coefficient 0.958 and an accuracy of 0.000 ± 0.304 mg/L was achieved between laboratory and optically estimated ß2M concentrations in spent dialysate for the entire cohort. Optically and laboratory estimated reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS) of ß2M were not statistically different (p > 0.35). Dialytic elimination of MM uremic toxin ß2M can be followed optically during dialysis treatment of ESKD patients. The main contributors to the optical signal of the MM fraction in the spent dialysate were provisionally identified as tryptophan (Trp) in small peptides and proteins, and advanced glycation end-products.

Serum Levels and Removal by Haemodialysis and Haemodiafiltration of Tryptophan-Derived Uremic Toxins in ESKD Patients.

Tryptophan is an essential dietary amino acid that originates uremic toxins that contribute to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient outcomes. We evaluated serum levels and removal during haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration of tryptophan and tryptophan-derived uremic toxins, indoxyl sulfate (IS) and indole acetic acid (IAA), in ESKD patients in different dialysis treatment settings. This prospective multicentre study in four European dialysis centres enrolled 78 patients with ESKD. Blood and spent dialysate samples obtained during dialysis were analysed with high-performance liquid chromatography to assess uremic solutes, their reduction ratio (RR) and total removed solute (TRS). Mean free serum tryptophan and IS concentrations increased, and concentration of IAA decreased over pre-dialysis levels (67%, 49%, -0.8%, respectively) during the first hour of dialysis. While mean serum total urea, IS and IAA concentrations decreased during dialysis (-72%, -39%, -43%, respectively), serum tryptophan levels increased, resulting in negative RR (-8%) towards the end of the dialysis session (p < 0.001), despite remarkable Trp losses in dialysate. RR and TRS values based on serum (total, free) and dialysate solute concentrations were lower for conventional low-flux dialysis (p < 0.001). High-efficiency haemodiafiltration resulted in 80% higher Trp losses than conventional low-flux dialysis, despite similar neutral Trp RR values. In conclusion, serum Trp concentrations and RR behave differently from uremic solutes IS, IAA and urea and Trp RR did not reflect dialysis Trp losses. Conventional low-flux dialysis may not adequately clear Trp-related uremic toxins while high efficiency haemodiafiltration increased Trp losses.